Skip to content

Tuesday, 6 October 2026 · New Delhi

Social Justice· Prelims · GS-II

Persons with disabilities: rights, the RPwD Act and inclusion

A GS-II guide to disability rights in India: the RPwD Act 2016, job and education quotas, the accessibility gap, support schemes and the inclusion agenda.

By the RaahUPSC editorial desk27 September 2026Updated 6 October 202633 min readintermediate

Disability policy in India underwent a quiet revolution in 2016. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act replaced the older welfare-style 1995 law with a rights-based framework: disability was no longer something to be pitied and assisted, but a status carrying enforceable rights to education, employment, accessibility and dignity. The Supreme Court put it memorably in the Vikash Kumar case: reasonable accommodation is a fundamental right, not charity. Yet a decade on, the gap between the statute and the street remains wide, and disability is still the vulnerability most likely to be invisible in policy debates.

This article maps the disability picture for GS-II: the status of persons with disabilities in India, the RPwD Act 2016 as the legal pivot, the ecosystem of schemes and institutions, the inclusion gaps in infrastructure, education, work and digital life, and the way ahead. (Note: mental-health law is covered in the health series articles; it appears here only where it intersects with disability rights.)

Disability in India: the status snapshot

  • Population share: about 2.21 percent (Census 2011), roughly 2.68 crore people; advocates argue the real figure may be 5 to 8 percent under global measurement standards, and the 2027 Census with expanded categories is expected to report higher.
  • Geography: about 69 percent live in rural areas, where services are thinnest.
  • Literacy: only around 54-55 percent, far below the national average.
  • Work: only about 34 percent are workers, and persons with disabilities form less than 1 percent of the workforce in over 800 listed companies.
  • Gender: about 44 percent are women, and disabled women face double marginalisation, with heightened risks of sexual abuse, domestic violence and poor reproductive healthcare.
  • Global context: WHO estimates about 15 percent of the world's population lives with some form of disability.

The RPwD Act, 2016: from welfare to rights

The 2016 Act is the pivot of modern disability policy. India ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2007, and the Act domesticates that treaty into enforceable domestic law.

Law

Approach

Coverage

What it changes

PWD Act, 1995

Welfare-style

7 specified disabilities

Assistance for the disabled; excluded large groups such as acid-attack survivors and persons with mental illness

RPwD Act, 2016

Rights-based

21 specified disabilities, adding mental illness, learning disabilities, dwarfism, Parkinson's disease and blood disorders

Enforceable rights to education, employment, accessibility and dignity; benchmark disability means 40% or more of a specified disability

National Trust Act, 1999

Guardianship

Autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation and multiple disabilities

Guardianship for those who cannot take legal decisions; Niramaya health insurance for the four groups

  • Definition: a person with long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which, in interaction with barriers, hinder full and effective participation in society; persons with benchmark disability are those with 40 percent or more of a specified disability.
  • Expanded recognition: specified disabilities rose from 7 to 21, adding acid-attack survivors, mental illness, learning disabilities, dwarfism, Parkinson's disease, blood disorders and others.
  • Reservations: 4 percent in government jobs and 5 percent in higher education for persons with benchmark disabilities.
  • Education: the right to free education for every child with benchmark disability aged 6 to 18.
  • Accessibility: mandates for barrier-free public buildings, transport and ICT.
  • Institutions: the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities at the Centre and State Commissioners as monitors; National and State Funds for financial support; Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors for offences against persons with disabilities.
  • Related rights law: the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 brought a rights-based approach to mental illness, including decriminalised suicide and advance directives.

The support ecosystem

The National Trust Act, 1999 created a statutory body under the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities for the welfare of persons with autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation and multiple disabilities (the terminology of the Act). It runs guardianship arrangements for those who cannot take legal decisions, and schemes such as Niramaya health insurance for these four groups. It matters as the pre-RPwD institutional pillar: before disability became a rights question in 2016, this Trust was the state's main answer for the most care-dependent disabilities.

  • Accessible India Campaign (Sugamya Bharat): the flagship nationwide campaign for universal accessibility in buildings, transport and ICT.
  • UDID project: a national database issuing Unique Disability ID cards for seamless benefit access.
  • SIPDA (Scheme for Implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act): financial and technical aid to states for implementing the RPwD Act.
  • ADIP scheme: assistance for purchase and fitting of aids and appliances.
  • Deendayal Disabled Rehabilitation Scheme (DDRS): financial assistance to NGOs for education and vocational training.
  • Niramaya insurance: affordable health insurance up to Rs 1 lakh for persons with autism, cerebral palsy and similar conditions.
  • NDFDC: concessional credit for divyang entrepreneurs, reported disbursements of Rs 1,330 crore.
  • Indian Sign Language standardisation: through the Indian Sign Language Research and Training Centre, including a 24x7 DTH channel and digital repositories for deaf students.
  • Para-athlete ecosystem: Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 promises parity in funding and training, with support reported for 52 para-athletes for the 2028 LA Olympics; treat as announced intent.
  • Divyang Sahara Yojana (2026): announced targeted funding for AI-driven indigenous assistive technology; an announcement, not an outcome.
  • Tele-MANAS: the National Tele Mental Health Programme, a toll-free helpline (14416) launched on 10 October 2022 for 24x7 tele-mental-health counselling in over 20 languages. An upgraded Tele MANAS app launched on World Mental Health Day 2025 carries the Asmi chatbot for mental-health guidance, an emergency module and accessibility features for visually impaired users.

The inclusion gap: where the law meets the street

The coaching-source line on the RPwD Act, that it "remains only a legal document without intense sensitisation", is polemical but points at a real pattern: strong statute, weak implementation.

  • Built environment: under 30 percent of public buildings meet accessibility standards (CAG).
  • Education: only 61 percent of disabled children aged 5-19 attend educational institutions (UNICEF 2025); inclusive pedagogy and special-educator training are thin.
  • Work: systemic bias and the absence of reasonable accommodation keep private-sector employment below 1 percent despite quotas; many states have not notified rules for district disability committees, delaying grievance redressal.
  • Digital exclusion: government websites and apps often lack screen-reader compatibility or captions, excluding persons with disabilities from the digital economy.
  • Healthcare: hospitals often lack sign-language interpreters and specialised therapeutic facilities.
  • Stigma: regressive beliefs, including the notion of disability as past-life karma, drive social isolation; disability is also invoked to deny legal capacity to persons with intellectual disabilities or mental illness.
  • Financial exclusion: high costs of assistive devices and few specialised insurance products produce "disability poverty".
  • Political invisibility: with no reservation in Parliament or assemblies, disability issues are rarely prioritised in policy debate.

What the courts have added

  • Vikash Kumar v. UPSC (2021): reasonable accommodation, like a scribe in examinations, is a fundamental right, not charity.
  • Rajive Raturi v. Union of India (2017): the Supreme Court directed the Centre to frame mandatory accessibility rules under the RPwD Act for public places and services.
  • Judicial Service ruling (2024): quashed rules barring visually impaired candidates from judicial services.
  • SC guidelines on portrayal: the Court has directed dignified, non-stereotyped representation of persons with disabilities in media, following the principle "nothing about us, without us".

Way ahead: the inclusion agenda

  • Universal design from the blueprint stage: mandatory accessibility audits for all new public infrastructure.
  • Inclusive pedagogy: train all teachers in special-education basics and expand assistive tech in classrooms.
  • Private-sector incentives: tax breaks and diversity scoring to pull disability employment beyond the 1 percent ceiling.
  • Digital saturation: make all government apps fully WCAG-compliant with screen-reader and caption support.
  • Community-based rehabilitation: use ASHA and anganwadi workers for early disability detection in rural areas.
  • Economic empowerment: interest subventions for PwD-led startups and priority-sector recognition.
  • Political representation: explore mandatory representation in panchayats and legislatures.
  • Social sensitisation: move public campaigns from sympathy to empathy and respect, with persons with disabilities leading the messaging.

Definitions to quote

Disability questions begin with three canonical definitions. Quote them exactly.

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities defines persons with disabilities as those with long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which, in interaction with various barriers, hinder their full participation in society.

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, which raised the recognised disabilities from 7 to 21, defines a person with benchmark disability as someone with at least 40 percent of a specified disability. Persons certified with at least 40 percent of specified disabilities are considered benchmark disabled.

Two models frame the field. The medical model locates disability within the individual and calls for medical intervention; the social model holds that disability arises from societal barriers that restrict participation. India's 2016 Act is explicitly a shift from the welfare approach to the rights-based approach.

The scale, per Census 2011: 26.8 million persons with disabilities, 2.21 percent of the population (14.9 million men, 11.9 million women); 69 percent live in rural areas; the largest disability groups are movement (20 percent), visual impairment (19 percent) and hearing impairment (19 percent); the highest concentration is in the 10-19 age group (4.62 million); and 34 percent are reported as workers. Globally, the WHO estimates 1 billion people, 15 percent of humanity, experience some form of disability, mostly in developing countries.

The 21 specified disabilities, grouped

The RPwD Act, 2016 expanded the recognised list from 7 to 21. For prelims, learn the groups.

Group

Disabilities

Physical

Locomotor disability; leprosy-cured person; cerebral palsy; dwarfism; muscular dystrophy; acid attack victims; blindness; low vision; deaf; hard of hearing; speech and language disability

Intellectual

Specific learning disabilities; autism spectrum disorder

Mental and behavioural

Mental illness

Chronic neurological

Multiple sclerosis; Parkinson's disease

Blood disorders

Haemophilia; thalassaemia; sickle cell disease

Multiple

Multiple disabilities

The RPwD (Amendment) Rules, 2024 at a glance

The 2024 amendments streamline certification and widen accessibility. Every row below is a prelims fact.

Change

Detail

Colour-coded UDID cards

White band: disability below 40 percent; Yellow band: 40 to 80 percent; Blue band: 80 percent and above

Online applications

Disability certificates and UDID cards can be applied for through the UDID portal; legal guardians or registered organisations may apply for minors or those unable to apply

Timelines

Medical authorities must issue certificates and cards within 3 months; rejections must be communicated with reasons within 1 month; appeals lie within 90 days under Section 59(1) of the Act

Certificate validity

Permanent certificates where no improvement is expected; temporary certificates with a specified validity where improvement is possible

New accessibility mandates

Accessibility standards extended to police stations, prisons and disaster mitigation centres

The support ecosystem at a glance

Programme

What it does

Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan)

A dedicated department for the welfare and empowerment of persons with disabilities

National Policy for Persons with Disabilities, 2006

Creates an environment of equal opportunities and full participation in society

Accessible India Campaign (Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan)

Barrier-free built environment, transport system and information and communication ecosystem

ADIP scheme

Assists needy disabled persons in procuring durable, sophisticated, scientifically manufactured, modern and standard aids and appliances

UDID

National database for persons with disabilities with a Unique Disability Identity Card for each person

MANI (RBI)

Mobile Aided Note Identifier: a mobile app helping visually impaired persons identify the denomination of Indian banknotes

National Fellowship for Students with Disabilities (RGMF)

200 fellowships each year for students with disabilities to pursue higher education

National Trust Act, 1999

Statutory body under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment for the welfare of persons with autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation and multiple disabilities

The constraints that blunt this ecosystem are familiar: undercounting from stigma, poor implementation especially in rural areas, inaccessible public infrastructure, attitudinal barriers, and a shortage of inclusive-education infrastructure and trained teachers.

The Court's disability-rights turn

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court declared that the right against disability-based discrimination is a fundamental right, rooted in equality, non-discrimination and dignity. In the same line of reasoning it struck down Rule 6A of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 1994, which disqualified visually impaired candidates, affirming their right to compete in judicial service examinations. The Court reiterated the principle of reasonable accommodation, enshrined in the RPwD Act, 2016 and international conventions, and stressed the State's responsibility for equal opportunity, accessibility and representation of persons with disabilities in public life.

On media portrayal, responding to a petition in the Aankh Micholi matter seeking a ban on derogatory depiction, the Court laid down a framework for visual media: avoid derogatory terms such as crippled or handicapped; avoid impairment-centred language like afflicted, suffering or victim; keep portrayals medically and socially accurate without sensationalism, such as giving every visually impaired character superpowers; follow "Nothing About Us Without Us" by involving persons with disabilities in content creation and review; consult disability-rights organisations; and put directors, writers, actors and producers through disability-sensitisation programmes.

Key Terms

  • Scheme for Implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act: The Scheme for Implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (SIPDA) is the umbrella scheme of the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities that funds the Act's implementation. It gives grants to states, UTs and central bodies for barrier-free public buildings, accessible government websites, skill development of persons with disabilities, the Accessible India Campaign, and disability certification camps. SIPDA funds ramps, lifts and tactile flooring in public buildings.
  • accessibility features for visually impaired users: Accessibility features for visually impaired users are design and infrastructure provisions such as screen readers, audio announcements, tactile paving, braille signage, and accessible websites that enable persons with visual disabilities to use public spaces and digital services independently. In India they are backed by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and the Sugamya Bharat campaign. They matter for UPSC because disability rights and inclusive governance appear in polity and social-justice questions. Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan (Accessible India Campaign), 2015
  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act: The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act is the 2016 statute that replaced the 1995 disability law and widened recognised disabilities from 7 to 21. It provides rights to accessibility, inclusive education, 4 percent job reservation, 5 percent reservation in higher education, social security, and penalties for discrimination. It matters for UPSC as the rights-based framework for disability justice, aligned with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. A university reserving 5 percent of seats for students with benchmark disabilities under this Act.
  • Nothing About Us Without Us: The principle that persons with disabilities must participate in content creation and review about them, per the Supreme Court's media framework
  • Medical model of disability: Disability lies within the individual and requires medical intervention
  • Mental Healthcare Act, 2017: The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 replaced the 1987 Act and made mental healthcare a justiciable right. It decriminalised attempted suicide (Section 115 presumes severe stress), introduced advance directives and nominated representatives, created Mental Health Review Boards, and regulated ECT and psychosurgery. For UPSC GS-2, it connects health, dignity under Article 21, and the state's duty toward vulnerable citizens.
  • Social model of disability: Disability arises from societal barriers that restrict participation, not from the impairment alone; the basis of the rights-based approach
  • National Trust Act, 1999: The National Trust Act, 1999, is the legislation establishing the National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities. The Trust provides legal guardianship, runs schemes such as Niramaya health insurance and Disha early intervention, and supports registered organisations caring for persons with these disabilities. It matters for UPSC GS-2 social justice, relevant to mains questions on disability rights alongside the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Niramaya health insurance scheme under the Trust covers persons with developmental disabilities
  • toll-free helpline (14416): The toll-free helpline 14416 is Tele-MANAS, the national tele-mental-health service of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. It gives free, confidential counselling through trained counsellors and mental-health professionals in multiple languages, alongside the 1-800-891-4416 line. It serves GS2 governance: health schemes and social justice. The National Tele Mental Health Programme, announced in the Union Budget 2022-23.
  • Unique Disability ID: The Unique Disability ID, or UDID card, is a single national identity card for persons with disabilities issued through the UDID portal by the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities. Launched in 2016, it builds a national database of persons with disabilities and replaces multiple documents for availing scheme benefits, with over 1.25 crore cards issued. For UPSC, it illustrates digitised welfare delivery. The UDID card became mandatory for availing Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities schemes from September 2024.
  • Khelo Bharat Niti: Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 is the National Sports Policy 2025, approved by the Union Cabinet on 1 July 2025 to replace the 2001 policy. It aims to make India a top-five sporting nation by 2047 and backs the 2036 Olympics bid, resting on five pillars: global excellence, economic development, social development, sports as a people's movement, and integration with education. It promises parity for para-athletes and links sports with tourism and manufacturing, and is current-affairs material for GS-2 and GS-3. the policy framework extends funding and training parity to para-athletes
  • UDID colour bands: White below 40 percent, yellow 40-80 percent, blue 80 percent and above: the colour-coded Unique Disability Identity Cards under the 2024 Rules

Practice questions

Q1Prelims practice

With reference to the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, consider the following statements:

  1. 1. It expanded recognised disabilities from 7 to 21 categories, including acid-attack survivors, mental illness and Parkinson's disease.
  2. 2. It defines persons with benchmark disability as those with 40 percent or more of a specified disability.
  3. 3. It provides 4 percent reservation in government jobs and 5 percent in higher education for persons with benchmark disabilities.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer

Answer: (D) All three statements are correct: the 2016 Act expanded recognised disabilities from 7 to 21, benchmark disability is 40 percent or more, and reservations are 4 percent in government jobs and 5 percent in higher education.

Q2Prelims practice

Consider the following statements about persons with disabilities in India:

  1. 1. They constitute about 2.21 percent of the population as per Census 2011.
  2. 2. About 69 percent of them reside in rural areas.
  3. 3. Their literacy rate is roughly comparable to the national average.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer

Answer: (A) Statements 1 and 2 are correct: the Census 2011 share is about 2.21 percent and about 69 percent live in rural areas. Statement 3 is incorrect: literacy among persons with disabilities is only around 54-55 percent, well below the national average.

Q3Prelims practice

With reference to Supreme Court judgments on disability rights, consider the following pairs: 1. Vikash Kumar v. UPSC (2021) : reasonable accommodation is a fundamental right, not charity. 2. Rajive Raturi (2017) : mandatory accessibility rules under the RPwD Act. 3. Judicial Service ruling (2024) : quashed bars on visually impaired candidates in judicial services. Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Show answer

Answer: (D) All three pairs are correctly matched: Vikash Kumar (2021) held reasonable accommodation to be a fundamental right; Rajive Raturi (2017) directed mandatory accessibility rules; the 2024 ruling quashed bars on visually impaired candidates in judicial services.

Q4Prelims practice

Consider the following pairs: 1. UDID : national database and Unique Disability ID cards. 2. Sugamya Bharat : nationwide campaign for universal accessibility. 3. ADIP (Assistance to Disabled Persons for Purchase/Fitting of Aids and Appliances) : assistance for purchase and fitting of aids and appliances. Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Show answer

Answer: (D) All three pairs are correctly matched: UDID is the national database with Unique Disability ID cards, Sugamya Bharat is the accessibility campaign, and ADIP assists with aids and appliances.

Q5Prelims practice

With reference to the inclusion gap for persons with disabilities, consider the following statements:

  1. 1. Under 30 percent of public buildings meet accessibility standards, as per CAG.
  2. 2. Only 61 percent of disabled children aged 5-19 attend educational institutions (UNICEF 2025).
  3. 3. Private-sector employment of persons with disabilities exceeds 5 percent despite quotas.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer

Answer: (A) Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect: private-sector employment of persons with disabilities remains below 1 percent despite quotas.

Answer key

  1. (d): All three statements are correct: the 2016 Act expanded recognised disabilities from 7 to 21, benchmark disability is 40 percent or more, and reservations are 4 percent in government jobs and 5 percent in higher education.
  2. (a): Statements 1 and 2 are correct: the Census 2011 share is about 2.21 percent and about 69 percent live in rural areas. Statement 3 is incorrect: literacy among persons with disabilities is only around 54-55 percent, well below the national average.
  3. (d): All three pairs are correctly matched: Vikash Kumar (2021) held reasonable accommodation to be a fundamental right; Rajive Raturi (2017) directed mandatory accessibility rules; the 2024 ruling quashed bars on visually impaired candidates in judicial services.
  4. (d): All three pairs are correctly matched: UDID is the national database with Unique Disability ID cards, Sugamya Bharat is the accessibility campaign, and ADIP assists with aids and appliances.
  5. (a): Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect: private-sector employment of persons with disabilities remains below 1 percent despite quotas.

Mains Practice question

Q. The RPwD Act, 2016 shifted Indian disability policy from welfare to rights, yet persons with disabilities remain among the most excluded citizens. Critically examine why the inclusion gap persists, and suggest an agenda to make inclusion real. (250 words)

Framing hintOpen with the 2016 pivot and the Vikash Kumar principle (reasonable accommodation as a right, not charity). Diagnose in three layers: physical-digital exclusion (under 30 percent accessible buildings, non-compliant apps); economic-educational exclusion (61 percent of disabled children in institutions, under 1 percent private-sector employment); and social-political invisibility (stigma, double marginalisation of women, no political reservation, thin state-level rule notification). Then build the agenda: universal design at blueprint stage, inclusive pedagogy, private-sector incentives, full WCAG compliance, community-based rehabilitation through ASHA and anganwadi workers, economic empowerment, political representation, and sensitisation led by persons with disabilities. Close with the rights frame: inclusion is not generosity but constitutional obligation.

Aligns with the GS-II mains bank's recurring themes on welfare schemes for vulnerable sections; treat coaching-attributed PYQ years as themes only, never as citations.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between disability and benchmark disability under the RPwD Act?

Disability is the broad category: long-term impairments that, in interaction with barriers, hinder participation. Benchmark disability is the threshold for most entitlements: 40 percent or more of a specified disability. Reservations in jobs and higher education, free education up to 18, and several scheme benefits attach to benchmark disability.

Why did the 2016 Act expand recognised disabilities from 7 to 21?

The 1995 Act's 7 categories excluded large groups: acid-attack survivors, persons with mental illness, learning disabilities, dwarfism, Parkinson's disease, blood disorders and others. Expansion, aligned with the UN Convention India ratified in 2007, brought these groups within legal protection and entitlements.

What is reasonable accommodation?

Modifications and adjustments necessary to let persons with disabilities exercise rights on an equal basis: scribes in exams, accessible formats, flexible work arrangements, sign-language interpretation. The Supreme Court in Vikash Kumar v. UPSC (2021) held it to be a fundamental right, not charity, which makes its denial a rights violation.

What is the Accessible India (Sugamya Bharat) campaign?

The flagship nationwide campaign for universal accessibility across built infrastructure, transport and ICT. It sets standards and drives retrofitting of public buildings, accessible transport and barrier-free digital services, though CAG data shows under 30 percent of public buildings currently meet the standards.

Why is disability data considered an undercount?

Census 2011 reported 2.21 percent, but advocates argue the real figure may reach 5 to 8 percent under global measurement standards. Causes: narrow definitions in enumeration, stigma leading families to hide disability, and invisible disabilities (mental illness, learning disabilities) being missed. The 2027 Census with expanded categories is expected to report higher.

How do disabled women face double marginalisation?

They face disability barriers plus gender barriers: heightened risks of sexual abuse and domestic violence, denial of reproductive healthcare, lower literacy and employment, and greater invisibility in both women's and disability policy. About 44 percent of persons with disabilities are women, making this a large, underserved intersection.

SJDisabilityPersons With Disabilitiesupsc-prelimsgs-paper-2GS2 12explained

Asked in the mains

Previous-year questions from this topic

How UPSC has actually asked this topic — with the year and marks for each question.

  1. 202210 marks

    The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 remains only a legal document without intense sensitisation of Government functionaries and citizens regarding disability. Comment.

  2. 201710 marks

    Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure an effective mechanism for empowerment and inclusion of the intended beneficiaries in the society? Discuss.

  3. 201710 marks

    Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure effective mechanism for empowerment and inclusion of the intended beneficiaries in the society? Discuss

Asked in the prelims

Previous-year MCQs from this topic

How UPSC has tested this topic in the prelims — pick an option to test yourself.

  1. 2026Prelims

    1.Which of the following statements with regard to the persons with disabilities in India is/are correct? 1. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 2018, mandates reservation in education and employment, places a legal duty on Governments to ensure accessibility and non-discrimination. 2. The Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan focuses on achieving universal accessibility for Persons with Disabilities across three key domains — built infrastructure, transport systems and information and communication technology. 3. The National Divyangjan Finance and Development Corporation (NDFDC) is a public sector organisation set up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs as a not-for-profit company to promote entrepreneurship among Persons with Disabilities (PwDs). Select the answer using the code given below:

  2. 2011Prelims

    2.India is home to lakhs of persons with disabilities. What are the benefits available to them under the law? 1. Free schooling till the age of 18 years in government-run schools. 2. Preferential allotment of land for getting up business. 3. Ramps in public buildings.

Ask Raah