Skip to content

Wednesday, 7 October 2026 · New Delhi

International Relations· Prelims · GS-II

India-Nepal: the closest neighbour under strain

Roti-beti ka rishta under stress: the 1950 treaty, the Kalapani map dispute, the 10,000 MW power deal and managing the sovereignty-sensitive neighbour.

By the RaahUPSC editorial desk27 September 2026Updated 30 September 202612 min readintermediate

Nepal is the neighbour India knows best and misunderstands most. Open borders, shared gods, intermarried families, Gorkha soldiers in Indian uniform: the famous roti-beti ka rishta. Yet the same intimacy breeds the "big brother" resentment that has made Kathmandu the hardest capital in South Asia for Delhi to read.

The exam lens is sovereignty versus intimacy. Every friction point, the 1950 treaty, the Kalapani map, the stalled Pancheshwar dam, the paused Gorkha recruitment, turns on the same question: how does a small state live next to a giant without feeling absorbed?

Roti-beti ka rishta: the special relationship

The ties are civilisational before they are diplomatic. Lumbini, the Buddha's birthplace, sits in Nepal; Pashupatinath draws Indian pilgrims by the million; and the sister-city pairings of Janakpur-Ayodhya, Kathmandu-Varanasi and Lumbini-Bodhgaya formalise the sacred geography. Tens of thousands of Nepali citizens serve in the Indian Army's Gorkha regiments, and the annual Surya Kiran joint exercise keeps the military bond routine.

C. Raja Mohan's formulation captures the asymmetry: for India, Nepal is the punya bhoomi, the sacred land; for Nepal, India is the karma bhoomi, the vast economic hinterland where livelihoods are made. India accounts for roughly two-thirds of Nepal's merchandise trade, and the open border means economics and identity are never separable.

The 1950 treaty: friendship with a sovereignty clause

The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1950 allows free movement of people and near-national treatment for citizens on each other's soil. The irritant is the clause obliging Nepal to consult India on arms imports from third countries, which Kathmandu reads as a sovereignty curb, a resentment that has only grown as Nepal diversifies its partnerships.

Both sides set up an Eminent Persons Group to review the relationship and recommend treaty amendments. The deeper fix, as Raja Mohan argues, is attitudinal: instead of an "India first" expectation, Delhi should support a "Nepal first" policy grounded in mutual respect for sovereignty.

Kalapani and the map crisis

In 2019 Nepal released a new political map claiming Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura in Uttarakhand, plus the Susta area, as Nepali territory, and later printed the map on its Rs 100 currency notes. The dispute turns on rival readings of the 1816 Sugauli Treaty's river boundary; India holds the areas as its own and has built the Lipulekh road link, which Nepal protested.

Delhi's preferred answer is depoliticisation: a joint technocratic commission to settle the boundary on survey evidence rather than street sentiment. The harder truth is that maps, once printed on currency, are difficult to unprint, which is why the file stays frozen.

The power corridor: 10,000 MW and hydro diplomacy

Energy is the relationship's growth story. A 2024 understanding targets 10,000 MW of Nepali electricity exports to India within a decade, with projects like the 900 MW Arun-III, Upper Karnali and the West Seti and Seti river developments in the pipeline. Power trade turns geography into revenue for Kathmandu and green electrons for India, the closest thing to a win-win in the bilateral file.

Water, though, is also the oldest deadlock. The Kosi Agreement (1954) and Gandak Agreement (1959) manage floods and irrigation, but the Mahakali Treaty's Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, signed in 1996, remains unbuilt over benefit-sharing disagreements. Project delays, from Kosi to Pancheshwar, are Kathmandu's standard exhibit of Indian unreliability.

The China factor in the hills

Beijing has become a serious economic presence: it is reported as Nepal's largest source of foreign direct investment, with projects from Pokhara International Airport to the Upper Trishuli hydropower plant. The partnership has been elevated to a strategic-level formulation, and the reported "Himalayan Quadrilateral" discussion excluding India signals how far the diversification has gone.

Delhi's counter is delivery rather than dictation: fast-tracked hydro projects, cross-border rail and petroleum pipelines like Motihari-Amlekhgunj, RBI permission for Indian banks to lend in rupees to Nepali entities, and an integrated regional energy grid. The contest is over who builds faster, not who lectures louder.

Instability, Agnipath and the trade gap

Nepal's chronic political instability, most recently visible in reported Gen-Z protests over corruption and governance, makes every agreement hostage to the next government. India's Agnipath scheme, with its four-year service terms, led Nepal to reportedly pause Gorkha recruitment, freezing a century-old institution over a policy Kathmandu was not consulted on.

The economics need rebalancing too. Nepal's trade deficit with India is reported at close to 18 percent of its GDP, and Kathmandu complains of non-tariff barriers. Inland waterways linking the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean, the Sagarmatha-to-Sagar idea, and sub-national diplomacy between Indian states and Nepali provinces are the proposed correctives.

The working details: mechanisms, money and the China question

The economics are stark: India is Nepal's largest trade partner, accounting for 64.1% of Nepal's total trade at $8.66 billion in FY 2022-23, with bilateral trade crossing NRS 1,134.53 billion that year. Indian firms account for about 40% of Nepal's total approved FDI, with roughly 150 Indian ventures operating in the country. On water and power, a bilateral mechanism set up in 2008 manages cooperation and hydropower development, and the two sides are working toward a 10,000 MW power-trade horizon.

The Treaty of Sugauli (1816) was signed between British India and the Kingdom of Nepal; it demarcated the Kali River as the western boundary, and Nepal ceded territories west of the river such as the Garhwal and Kumaon regions. The current dispute flows from interpretation: India holds the Kali originates near Kalapani, while Nepal argues it originates at Limpiyadhura.

The border has its own institutional plumbing: the India-Nepal Border Joint Technical Committee (1981), the Joint Border Inspection Mechanism (1981) and the Joint Border Management Committee (1997). Kalapani remains undemarcated, particularly the 'no-man's land' stretches.

China's Nepal play has several moving parts. Nepal joined the Belt and Road Initiative in 2017, and a framework now aims to implement projects under a Trans-Himalayan Connectivity Network covering roads, rail, aviation and power. The PLA and the Nepali Army held their first joint military exercises in 2017 and 2018, and since 2019 the PLA has provided financial assistance to the Nepali Army on a regular basis. China's specific worry for Delhi is infrastructure near the border, notably the Chinese-built Pokhara airport, and the Himalayan 'Quadrilateral' meeting of China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Nepal, which Delhi reads as an attempt to contain India in South Asia.

Why this is in the news: the Kalapani-Lipulekh-Limpiyadhura map dispute resurfaces every election cycle on both sides, and the open border keeps Nepal central to India's internal-security calculus.

India-Nepal at a glance

Dimension

Status

Trade

India: 64.1% of Nepal's trade ($8.66B, FY23); ~150 Indian ventures; ~40% of approved FDI

Defence & security

Surya Kiran exercise; Gorkha regiments; open-border security concerns

People

Roti-beti ka rishta; Janakpur-Ayodhya sister cities; Pashupatinath restoration

Key agreements

Treaty of Peace and Friendship (1950); BBIN; SAARC/BIMSTEC

What examiners keep asking

  • Frame every answer on the intimacy-sovereignty tension: the same open border that enables roti-beti ties enables the big-brother grievance.
  • The 10,000 MW power target is the standard "way forward" fact: energy co-ownership as the answer to asymmetry.
  • For map and treaty questions, name the instruments precisely: Sugauli 1816, Treaty of 1950, Mahakali 1996.

Key Terms

  • Joint Border Management Committee (1997): The bilateral mechanism for managing the India-Nepal border; Kalapani remains undemarcated.
  • Treaty of Peace and Friendship: The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1950 between India and Nepal established an open border and reciprocal national treatment for citizens of both countries. Its provisions on security consultation and equal economic rights have drawn periodic Nepali demands for review, especially Articles 6 and 7. For UPSC it is central to India-Nepal relations in GS-2, linking neighbourhood policy, migration and sovereignty debates. signed on 31 July 1950 at Kathmandu
  • Treaty of Sugauli (1816): The Treaty of Sugauli (1816) was signed between British India and the Kingdom of Nepal; it demarcated the Kali River as the western boundary, and Nepal ceded territories west of the river such as the Garhwal and Kumaon regions.
  • Trans-Himalayan Connectivity Network: The BRI-linked framework of roads, rail, aviation and power projects connecting China and Nepal.
  • Pokhara International Airport: A Chinese-built airport near the India-Nepal border that raises Indian security concerns.
  • Himalayan Quadrilateral: A meeting format bringing together China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Nepal, which India views as a Chinese attempt to contain it in South Asia.
  • Mahakali Treaty: The Mahakali Treaty is the 1996 India-Nepal agreement on integrated development of the Mahakali (Sharda) river. It bundles the Sarada Barrage, Tanakpur Barrage and the proposed Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, sharing water, power and costs equally. It replaced the 1920 Sarada agreement. For UPSC it is a classic mains example of transboundary water diplomacy, lingering implementation delays and India-Nepal bilateral relations. the long-pending Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project on the Mahakali
  • Sugauli Treaty: Sugauli Treaty is the 1816 treaty ending the Anglo-Nepalese War (1814-16) between the East India Company and the Gorkha kingdom. Nepal ceded Garhwal, Kumaon and much of the Terai, accepted a British Resident at Kathmandu, and opened the door to Gorkha recruitment into the British Indian Army. It fixed the India-Nepal frontier and is a staple of GS-1 modern history and India-Nepal relations answers. Anglo-Nepalese War, 1814-16
  • Kalapani: Kalapani is a disputed Himalayan territory administered by India as part of Pithoragarh district, Uttarakhand, and claimed by Nepal, which argues that the Kali river named as the boundary in the 1816 Sugauli Treaty lies further west. The Lipulekh pass trade route with China runs through the area. For UPSC it is the core of the India-Nepal boundary dispute, sharpened by India's 2019 political map and Nepal's 2020 constitutional map amendment. Nepal's 2020 constitutional amendment incorporating Kalapani into its official map
  • SAGAR: SAGAR stands for Security and Growth for All in the Region, India's maritime vision for the Indian Ocean announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his 2015 visit to Mauritius. It seeks cooperative security, blue-economy development, and capacity building among Indian Ocean littoral states. For UPSC, SAGAR is the doctrinal anchor of India's Indian Ocean policy and its response to China's naval presence. India's Mission SAGAR naval deployments, which delivered COVID-19 relief supplies to Indian Ocean island nations in 2020, are named for the vision.

Practice questions

Q1Prelims practice

Consider the following statements about India-Nepal relations:

  1. The Treaty of Peace and Friendship was signed in 1950.
  2. Citizens of both countries enjoy near-national treatment on each other's soil.
  3. Nepal's May 2020 political map claims Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer

Answer: (D) All three are correct: the 1950 treaty, near-national treatment, and the May 2020 map claims.

Q2Prelims practice

The Arun-III hydroelectric project in Nepal has an installed capacity of:

Show answer

Answer: (C) Arun-III is a 900 MW project, the flagship of the power partnership.

Q3Prelims practice

Surya Kiran is best described as:

Show answer

Answer: (B) Surya Kiran is the annual India-Nepal joint military exercise.

Q4Prelims practice

The Mahakali Treaty between India and Nepal was signed in:

Show answer

Answer: (C) The Mahakali Treaty was signed in 1996; Pancheshwar remains unbuilt.

Q5Prelims practice

Consider the following statements:

  1. The Kosi Agreement was signed in 1954.
  2. The Gandak Agreement was signed in 1959.
  3. The Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project falls under the Mahakali Treaty of 2001.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer

Answer: (A) Statements 1 and 2 are correct; the Mahakali Treaty dates to 1996, not 2001.

Answer key

  1. (d): All three are correct: the 1950 treaty, near-national treatment, and the May 2020 map claims.
  2. (c): Arun-III is a 900 MW project, the flagship of the power partnership.
  3. (b): Surya Kiran is the annual India-Nepal joint military exercise.
  4. (c): The Mahakali Treaty was signed in 1996; Pancheshwar remains unbuilt.
  5. (a): Statements 1 and 2 are correct; the Mahakali Treaty dates to 1996, not 2001.

Mains Practice question

Q. The 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship is both the foundation and the irritant of India-Nepal relations. Discuss in the context of Nepal's sovereignty concerns and suggest a way forward. (250 words)

Framing hintOpen with the punya bhoomi-karma bhoomi asymmetry, then diagnose: the treaty's open-border generosity versus its arms-consultation clause, the Kalapani map as sovereignty assertion, and project delays as trust erosion. Close with the "Nepal first" posture, EPG amendments and energy co-ownership as the repair kit.

Nepal recurs in the GS-II bank as a sovereignty-and-sensitivity theme; boundary, water and power questions are the standard mains angles.

Frequently asked questions

What does the 1950 treaty actually say?

It provides for peace and friendship, free movement of people across the open border, and near-national treatment for citizens. The contentious clause requires Nepal to consult India on arms imports from third countries.

What is the Kalapani dispute?

Nepal claims Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura in Uttarakhand, areas India administers, citing the 1816 Sugauli Treaty's river boundary. Nepal's May 2020 political map and its Rs 100 note assert the claim.

Why is the Pancheshwar project stalled?

The multipurpose dam under the 1996 Mahakali Treaty is deadlocked over benefit-sharing between India and Nepal, a decades-long exhibit of how water cooperation stalls on trust.

Why did Nepal pause Gorkha recruitment?

Nepal reportedly paused recruitment after India's Agnipath scheme introduced four-year service terms, objecting that a century-old institution was being reshaped without Kathmandu's consultation.

What is the Eminent Persons Group?

A joint India-Nepal group set up to review the bilateral relationship, including amendments to the 1950 treaty, and recommend a forward-looking framework.

IRIndia NepalNepalupsc-prelimsgs-paper-2GS2 17explained
Ask Raah